Steiner School Forced Out Of Education


Parents from a Steiner school in Gloucestershire are taking legal action against Ofsted/DfE over their school’s forced closure

Distinguished QC and human rights lawyer Michael Mansfield takes on case.

Action highlights growing concerns over Ofsted’s lack of accountability and scrutiny of decision making.

School’s closure part of Ofsted chief’s alleged ‘witch hunt’ against Steiner education.

A group of parents and supporters of Wynstones, one of the UK’s oldest Steiner schools (est. 1937) based in Gloucestershire, are fighting back against a decision by the Department for Education requiring it to close down following a controversial Ofsted inspection in January this year.

The school’s overnight closure, with just a few hours notice, left over 200 children and their families without any education provision or assistance from either the DfE or the local education authority. Teachers were ordered to have no further contact with their former pupils or parents – even if they passed them on the street; while children, some studying for GCSEs and A levels, were left high and dry with no support or help from other agencies.

Arthur Edwards, a parent of two children at the school at the time of its closure and spokesperson for the group behind the action, explained:

“We are seeking recompense for the devastating impact the school’s closure has had on many of the 220 children and their families. The whole Wynstones school community has been deeply traumatised by this experience. Teachers demoralised and facing redundancies, families scrabbling to try and find alternative schools and children thrown into diagnosable anxiety and depression.”

He continued: “We believe that Ofsted has operated in a high-handed manner without regard for real educational principles, using “safeguarding” as a pretext for closing the school.” 


The Wynstones case comes at a time when criticism of Ofsted and the way it operates is increasingly under scrutiny. Many teachers, parents and educators believe this amounts to bullying and subjective targets which promote a culture of fear in schools and a potentially harmful impact on children’s mental health and education.

Dr Richard House, freelance educational consultant,a former university lecturer in education and member of the Wynstones group said,

“We are pursuing a judicial review to highlight the fact that while Ofsted has great power to judge and regulate others, it is arguably itself above the lawbecause of the enormous costs involved in mounting court action. We are seeking just recompense for the harm caused by this forced school closure and to put the case for a different, more sympathetic approach to assessing educational outcomes which takes full and informed account of pedagogical diversity. This case is not just about Wynstones, it is shining a strong light on a much wider malaise in how England’s schools are currently evaluated and held to account.”

Funds are urgently needed, however, to cover the legal costs of a judicial review to help this small but determined band of parents take on the might of Ofsted and the DfE. 

The Wynstones Parents Initiative is a group of over 50 parents, many giving testimony to the trauma experienced by the sudden school closure and lack of support. See separate report from a parent survey on the impact of the closure:

A Crowdfunding campaign has raised over £16,000 and other fundraising events are planned, however to issue the claim a further £15k is needed.

The WIP group’s website can be found at

Richard House’s new book, Pushing Back to Ofsted, shows in detail how irrational and unfounded many of its Ofsted’sjudgements are, not only of Wynstones but more widely. See


  1. why do they not mention a single one of the OFSTED reasons or allegations? Makes you wonder. I would not be surprised if they had a case against OFSTED somewhere, but from personal encounters I have come to suspect the Steiner ideology in two countries as warped as any religion where not based on authentic spiritual insight.

    • Your answer lacks the same examples as you were asking for in the first place. You met two Steiner people in two countries……what happened…tell us more.

  2. Barbara writes of Steiner ideology being “as warped as any religion where not based on authentic spiritual insight”… – well there’s enough material for a whole conference there! (with apologies to Fawlty Towers). Just some of the questions begged are: (1) invoking the term “warped” implies that you know what an “UNwarped”, true ideology consists in – yet what gives you the authority to assert this, and to assume that you somehow have privileged access to spiritual truth over other spiritual paths? And again (2), who, pray, is the arbiter of what constitutes “authentic spiritual insight”? At least Steiner himself was all-too aware of this issue – giving a celebrated series of lectures in Torquay in 1924, shortly before he died, on “true and false spiritual paths”. I know a lot about humanistic education – an approach to education and schooling that the political left should throw all its weight behind; and Steiner education is one of the best, most successful exemplars of humanistic education – whatever one’s spiritual beliefs might be. That’s why it thrives in so many different cultural contexts across the globe.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here